Key Point

Raising legal argument and offering zero for some heads of loss did not justify removal from Portal

Dickinson v Langford

Birkenhead CC, 14th February 2013

Here the Claimant sought care as a head of loss. The Defendant offered zero for this and entered a full defence. The Claimant removed the claim from the Portal and issued Part 7 proceedings in response, claiming that given the dispute and the nature of the defence, the Portal was no longer suitable.

However, the court found that the claim should have stayed in the Portal and restricted the Claimant to Portal costs.

Click here for a copy

of the judgment

Go back to Main Index

Main Index

Go back to Topic Index

Topic Index