Key Point

Defendant recovered indemnity costs because of C's unreasonable exit from Portal

Uppal v Daudia

DDJ Matthews, Leicester CC, 14th May 2012

The Claimant removed the claim from the Portal after the Defendant failed to reply to its second offer. The court confirmed that the Defendant only needs to make one offer in the Portal. Therefore the exit from the Portal was unreasonable.

As the Claimant had acted unreasonably, it followed that the Defendant was entitled to their costs of the Part 7 proceedings on an indemnity basis.

Click here for the Lawtel case summary

Go back to Main Index

Main Index

Go back to Topic Index

Topic Index